TRAI QoS rules 2026 are still a draft consultation, not enforceable telecom rules. The proposal would expand mobile-outage coverage, create a significant-outage framework for fixed broadband, require complaint access during disruptions, test coverage-map accuracy, shorten billing-complaint timelines and add new silence-call, 5G network-slicing and Quality of Experience measures.
The most important distinction is that outage rebates, speed testing, coverage maps and graded penalties already exist under TRAI’s 2024 regulations. The 2026 draft would expand, tighten or clarify those rules rather than create India’s entire mobile and broadband quality framework from scratch.
What may change under TRAI QoS rules 2026?
The strongest proposed changes are a wider mobile-outage test, a new fixed-broadband outage and severe-slowdown framework, complaint booking during outages, at least 98% coverage-map accuracy, one-week billing resolution, a silence-call benchmark, 5G slicing controls and a possible public Quality of Experience score.
Consultation open — final rules not notified
TRAI released the draft consultation on August 5, 2026. Comments are due by August 26 and counter-comments by September 7. The proposed October 1, 2026 commencement date has no legal effect unless TRAI issues a final Gazette notification.
- Mobile significant-outage reporting for district-wide failures lasting over four hours.
- Postpaid rent rebates and prepaid validity extensions for qualifying mobile outages over 24 hours.
- Typical-speed testing for mobile and fixed broadband.
- Technology-wise mobile coverage maps.
- Wireline repair targets, billing complaint rules and graded financial disincentives.
- The 10%-of-LSA mobile outage trigger.
- Fixed-broadband significant outages and the 20% slowdown test.
- Mandatory complaint access or automatic fault tickets during outages.
- 98% coverage-map accuracy.
- One-week billing complaint resolution.
- Silence-call, network-slicing and QoE-score provisions.
Table of contents
- What is in force now?
- Existing rule versus draft proposal
- Mobile outage expansion
- Broadband outage and slowdown test
- Complaint access during outages
- Coverage-map accuracy
- Billing complaint deadline
- Typical-speed claims
- Silence calls
- 5G slicing and QoE score
- Penalty changes
- How to submit comments
- How this was verified
- Limitations
- FAQs
What is in force now, and what is only proposed?
TRAI’s 2024 Quality of Service regulations remain the enforceable framework for mobile, wireline and broadband services. They took effect on October 1, 2024 and already contain reporting, repair, speed, coverage-map, billing and penalty obligations.
The 2026 paper is a consultation on amendments. Operators and consumers do not acquire a new right merely because a proposal appears in the consultation text.
The consultation proposes October 1, 2026 as a commencement date. That date remains provisional until TRAI publishes a final amendment in the Gazette.
Existing 2024 rule versus TRAI’s 2026 draft
| Area | Existing enforceable position | 2026 draft proposal | Material change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile outage | District-wide service loss for more than four hours | Add complete loss affecting over 10% of LSA subscribers for more than four hours | Expanded |
| Mobile rebate | Rent rebate or validity extension after qualifying outage exceeds 24 hours | Align benefit with expanded outage test | Existing right widened |
| Fixed broadband outage | Individual fault and repair benchmarks | Formal significant-outage category, including large-scale degradation | New |
| Broadband degradation | No equivalent significant-outage trigger | At least 20% speed reduction affecting over 10% of subscribers for over four hours | New |
| Complaint access | No express always-accessible outage-booking rule identified | Complaint registration or automatic fault-ticket mapping during outages | New |
| Coverage maps | Technology-wise maps must be published | At least 98% accuracy, validated against measured samples | Major tightening |
| Billing complaints | 100% within four weeks | 100% within one week | Faster |
| Typical speed | Percentile testing already applies | Clearer 100%-of-tariff-offerings compliance test | Clarified/tightened |
| Silence calls | No dedicated benchmark | No more than 1% | New |
| 5G slicing | No slice-specific PRB rule | Capacity benchmark and 21-day advance information | New |
| QoE score | Separate reports and survey findings may be published | Service-wise Quality of Experience score | New |
| False reporting penalties | Escalating ₹2 lakh, ₹5 lakh and ₹10 lakh levels already exist | Clarified per benchmark/report basis and broader non-compliance route | Expanded enforcement |
How would mobile significant-outage rules expand?
The current mobile rule focuses on a district where wireless service remains unavailable continuously for more than four hours.
The draft would retain that test and add another: complete loss of service affecting more than 10% of an operator’s subscribers in the Licensed Service Area for more than four continuous hours.
This matters because a major outage can be geographically dispersed. It may affect a large share of subscribers without taking every site in one district offline.
The existing rebate mechanism is not new. Under the current regulations, a qualifying outage exceeding 24 hours can trigger a proportional rent rebate for postpaid users or an equivalent prepaid-plan validity extension. The proposal mainly expands the events and users that may fall within that mechanism.
Would severe broadband slowdowns count as outages?
This is one of the most important genuinely new proposals. The draft would create a significant-outage framework for fixed broadband where:
- service across a district is unavailable for more than four hours; or
- more than 10% of subscribers in the service area experience complete loss or material degradation for more than four hours.
Material degradation is proposed as at least a 20% reduction in download or upload speed compared with the operator’s declared typical speed.
The proposal also adds a fixed-broadband Mean Time to Repair benchmark of no more than 10 hours. The 2024 framework already has fault-rate and next-day/three-day repair benchmarks, but this would add a separate MTTR measure to the broadband table.
A single home connection running 20% slower would not automatically become a significant network outage. The proposed trigger also requires the specified scale and continuous duration.
Could operators block complaint booking during an outage?
TRAI proposes that complaint-registration facilities remain accessible even during network-wide or local disruption.
Affected subscribers would have to be allowed to register a complaint or be automatically mapped to a system-generated fault ticket.
This is important because fault-repair and rebate calculations often depend on a registered event. An inaccessible complaint channel can prevent users from creating a formal record precisely when the service is failing.
What would the 98% coverage-map rule change?
Operators already have to publish technology-wise geospatial mobile coverage maps. The draft moves from map availability toward map accuracy.
The proposed benchmark is at least 98% accuracy. TRAI may compare map claims with independent drive-test samples, geolocated information from TRAI applications and measured signal strength at locations shown as covered.
The draft also envisages consumer feedback against the published map. This could make coverage maps more useful when users choose a provider or complain about a mismatch between advertised and actual coverage.
Would billing complaints have to be resolved in one week?
Yes, if the draft is adopted unchanged.
The current 2024 rule requires 100% of billing or charging complaints to be resolved within four weeks. The draft reduces that period to one week.
Billing and charging complaints can include monetary deductions, incorrect bills, validity disputes and other account adjustments. The existing rule requiring credits or adjustments after resolution would continue to matter separately.
Are typical-speed tests new?
No. The 2024 rules already test operator claims through percentile-based measurements: mobile at the 80th percentile and wireline broadband at the 90th percentile.
The draft more clearly frames compliance as the percentage of tariff offerings where the measured percentile speed meets or exceeds the offered typical speed, with a proposed 100% benchmark.
Write that TRAI proposes to tighten and clarify typical-speed compliance. Do not describe percentile testing as a new 2026 invention.
What is the proposed silence-call benchmark?
The draft introduces a silence-call rate benchmark of no more than 1%.
A silence call is a call that appears connected but has no usable two-way audio or has materially impaired audio. TRAI proposes a separate indicator because this problem can disappear inside broader call-quality measurements.
The consultation does not presently place this parameter under the main financial-disincentive route used for several other benchmarks. That treatment could still change in the final rule.
What are the proposed 5G network-slicing and QoE rules?
5G network slicing
The draft proposes that no more than 1% of relevant cells should have daily Physical Resource Block utilisation above 80%. Operators planning a new slice would provide capacity and parameter details to TRAI at least 21 days before launch.
Quality of Experience Score
TRAI may publish a service-wise score combining network performance, consumer service and consumer-perception information from multiple sources.
The 5G proposal is designed to prevent specialised or premium slices from degrading ordinary subscriber service. The QoE proposal may make operator comparison easier, but the final scoring methodology and presentation remain unresolved.
Are the ₹2 lakh, ₹5 lakh and ₹10 lakh penalties new?
No. Escalating financial disincentives for false QoS reporting already exist in the 2024 framework.
The 2026 draft would make enforcement clearer by stating how the amount applies per benchmark and compliance report, creating a separate false-reporting provision, defining a specified mismatch threshold in relevant cases, adding a route for other regulatory non-compliance and strengthening consequences for prolonged failure to submit reports.
These are penalties payable by operators to the regulatory framework. They are not direct compensation automatically payable to every affected consumer.
How can consumers and organisations submit comments?
Read the consultation
Review the proposed amendment, schedules and explanatory note.
Submit comments
TRAI’s stated deadline is August 26, 2026.
Counter-comments
Responses to published comments are due by September 7, 2026.
Submissions may be sent to the official QoS consultation email published by TRAI. A useful submission should identify the draft clause, explain the practical problem, provide evidence where possible and propose specific wording or a measurable benchmark.
Official sources
- TRAI consultation page for the 2026 draft amendments
- TRAI consultation paper and draft amendment PDF
- TRAI 2024 Access and Broadband QoS Regulations
Related ThePulseSignal guides
TRAI MyCall vs Truecaller
Explains the purpose, permissions, privacy boundaries and complaint limitations of TRAI’s call-quality feedback app.
Non-TC drone registration in India
A separate regulatory guide showing how to distinguish enforceable requirements from proposed or misunderstood rules.
How this was verified
ThePulseSignal compared the August 5, 2026 TRAI consultation paper and draft amendments with the enforceable 2024 Access and Broadband Quality of Service Regulations.
The 2024 regulation was checked for the current mobile significant-outage rule, outage rebates, mobile and broadband typical-speed benchmarks, coverage-map duties, fault-repair standards, billing complaint timelines and existing financial-disincentive structure.
The 2026 draft was checked for the 10%-of-LSA outage test, fixed-broadband significant outages, the 20% degradation threshold, complaint availability, coverage-map accuracy, one-week billing resolution, silence calls, network slicing, Quality of Experience scoring and revised enforcement provisions.
Last verified: August 6, 2026, approximately 9:01 AM IST.
Limitations and unresolved facts
- The consultation is not a final amendment and may change after stakeholder comments.
- The proposed October 1, 2026 date is not an operative commencement date.
- The final QoE-score methodology and public format remain unresolved.
- TRAI may alter outage, degradation, coverage-map or network-slicing thresholds.
- The operational method for identifying every affected user under the proposed 10% test may be refined.
- The final treatment of silence-call non-compliance and financial disincentives may change.
- This article does not determine entitlement in an individual outage or billing dispute.
Frequently asked questions
Are TRAI QoS rules 2026 already in force?
No. They are draft amendments under consultation.
Are mobile outage rebates new?
No. They already exist for qualifying mobile outages under the 2024 regulations. The draft proposes wider eligibility.
Would a broadband slowdown count as an outage?
Under the draft, a large-scale slowdown meeting the proposed 20%, subscriber-share and duration tests could qualify as a significant outage.
Would operators have to accept complaints during an outage?
The draft proposes complaint registration or automatic mapping to a system-generated fault ticket during disruptions.
Are coverage maps already required?
Yes. The proposed change is an accuracy benchmark of at least 98%, not the first requirement to publish maps.
Would billing complaints have to be resolved within one week?
That is the draft proposal. The current benchmark is four weeks.
When are consultation comments due?
Comments are due August 26, 2026 and counter-comments September 7, 2026.
Will the rules definitely start on October 1, 2026?
No. That date is proposed in the draft and requires a final notified amendment.